Ford Focus ST Forum banner

cp-e™ ΔCore Front Mount Intercooler Pre-Release Info

27K views 71 replies 32 participants last post by  www.cp-e.com  
#1 · (Edited)
cp-e™ ΔCore Front Mount Intercooler

We wanted to give you guys a quick update on our new, bolt in front mount intercooler kit for the ST!

The intercooler features:
  • Cast end tanks with internal turbulence reducer connect to factory intercooler piping
  • No modification to bumper support required, 100% bolt in
  • Largest core possible
Image

Production has finished and the kit is on track to be released in the upcoming weeks! Stay Tuned for release date, pricing, and dyno graph!
 
#3 ·
#13 ·
saw it on fb. pretty pumped, except i wont have the money for it for a LONG time.
 
#16 ·
Hopefully I'm not getting anyone in trouble here, but it turns out there were a few unprotected directories for another host of that image... enjoy the pre-release goodness :) This looks like my favorite so far!
WOW That looks WAAAAAAAAAAY too thick. Honestly 3" should be max. I cant see how that is anymore efficient than its 3" counterpart.
 
#21 · (Edited)
End tanks play large role is how effective an intercooler is. Notice OE end tanks, where ends come off nearly flat with top surface - that is optimal. Sharp angle of end tank to intercooler does not promote good flow.



Other option to to use "backdoor" design and just dump the air into end tank and use resulting turbulence to distribute air across the voids. You need turbulence for heat exchange to take place. Flow will be function of area vs pressure differential.



This is "backdoor" type intercooler end tank arrangement. This also gives you nice surface to install BOV on the end tank.

http://www.beta-cae.gr/events/c3pdf/233-1-nitsopoulos.pdf

Good reading & pics - illustrates just how complex CFD can be and how designs that look like they don't work (pinched pipes, etc) actually perform well. For boku bucks being charged for some of these interccolers, I fully expect a matching CFD analysis :).
 
#22 ·
End tanks play large role is how effective an intercooler is. Notice OE end tanks, where ends come off nearly flat with top surface - that is optimal. Sharp angle of end tank to intercooler does not promote good flow.

View attachment 18852

Other option to to use "backdoor" design and just dump the air into end tank and use resulting turbulence to distribute air across the voids. You need turbulence for heat exchange to take place. Flow will be function of area vs pressure differential.

View attachment 18851

This is "backdoor" type intercooler end tank arrangement. This also gives you nice surface to install BOV on the end tank.

http://www.beta-cae.gr/events/c3pdf/233-1-nitsopoulos.pdf

Good reading & pics - illustrates just how complex CFD can be and how designs that look like they don't work (pinched pipes, etc) actually perform well. For boku bucks being charged for some of these interccolers, I fully expect a matching CFD analysis :).

Exactly why I am having baffles installed.
 
#24 ·
Holy massive core, that is the thickest setup I have ever seen! Good thing the radiator can still get air from above, because no way that core is sharing anything through it lol.
 
#27 ·
Our endtanks and core have been tested, re-tested, reengineered, tested and re-tested multiple times to get our FMIC to where it is now. We are happy that our product has generated so much interest. Keep your eye out closer to release for some solid test results, but as for now discuss on
 
#28 ·
Can't wait to see an install.

Probably has 'custom' brackets.....?

If not, it's genuine bolt-on that would be awesome.
 
#29 ·
Can't wait to see an install.

Probably has 'custom' brackets.....?

If not, it's genuine bolt-on that would be awesome.
I would think so because the weight of that intercooler as a whole is going to be heavier than all on the market at the moment.
 
#31 ·
Hey guys, my car is one of the test vehicles running this front mount and I don't know how much I can say, but I can confirm that there is no change in spool with with this core.

I was a little afraid that this core would cause a serious pressure drop, but the changes have only been positive. The charge air temps are way, way down, and the car actually picked up horsepower and torque even on the stock tune. I'm really impressed with the build quality, fitment, and performance with this core so far.
 
#34 ·
CP-E - You have me at the cast end tanks. I have been preaching for a while that someone needs to make a FMIC with cast end tanks and you show up with this...

Questions for you and the team:

- No vehicle modifications - Does that mean no shutter removal either?
- Can you share mounting point details?
- Are you running stock pipes on the test cars or a prototype?
- What is release ETA?

Just curious...
 
#35 ·
the shutters are removed

as far as i know the mounting points are the same as stock.
 
#37 ·
Because of the 'volume'.