Ford Focus ST Forum banner
281 - 300 of 321 Posts
95605's are backordered at all my local parts stores, NGK's website says the 90495 is the correct ruthenium plug for the ST, looks identical to the 95605 just a step colder, any reason not to go that route?

Edit: numbers are hard, it's a step warmer, that's why you all go with the 605. NEVERMIND NOTHING TO SEE HERE.....
 
What’s the difference between the NGK LTR6IX(94374) and the NGK LTR6IX-11(6509)?
Link to explain what the numbers mean.

Very interesting. So on the NGK website, the LTR6IX-11 that is recommended here on FocusST isn’t listed as being compatible with the ST. Whilst the regular one(94374) is. So the only difference is the gap, and it makes sense given that the 6509 plug is listed as having a .041 gap and the 94374 plug has a gap coming in at .031. So same plug, different gap.

Also an interesting thing I’ve noticed is that the NGKs sold at autozone and oreily are all made in Taiwan, whilst the ones sold on Rockauto are not only significantly cheaper, but they’re also made in japan.
 
After spending an unnecessary amount of time reading through this thread, I decided to buy pre-gapped.026 NGK Ruth plugs. However, after I purchased, the website I bought them from said that .026 is for E30 fuels and .028 is for 91/93 fuels. I'm on a stock tune and only use 91/93 fuels so now I'm thinking I bought the wrong plugs...? It seemed from most of the convos on here that .026 would work for my set up. Any help is appreciated
 
Discussion starter · #287 ·
After spending an unnecessary amount of time reading through this thread, I decided to buy pre-gapped.026 NGK Ruth plugs. However, after I purchased, the website I bought them from said that .026 is for E30 fuels and .028 is for 91/93 fuels. I'm on a stock tune and only use 91/93 fuels so now I'm thinking I bought the wrong plugs...? It seemed from most of the convos on here that .026 would work for my set up. Any help is appreciated
.026" is fine.
 
After spending an unnecessary amount of time reading through this thread, I decided to buy pre-gapped.026 NGK Ruth plugs. However, after I purchased, the website I bought them from said that .026 is for E30 fuels and .028 is for 91/93 fuels. I'm on a stock tune and only use 91/93 fuels so now I'm thinking I bought the wrong plugs...? It seemed from most of the convos on here that .026 would work for my set up. Any help is appreciated
Hey man, I'm about to pull the trigger on the same set myself. Getting a bunch of parts and maintenance "resets" for my ST right now.

Where did you order from? I made a note to order from Tune Plus about a month ago and they were $29.99, now they are $50. :(
 
Hey man, I'm about to pull the trigger on the same set myself. Getting a bunch of parts and maintenance "resets" for my ST right now.

Where did you order from? I made a note to order from Tune Plus about a month ago and they were $29.99, now they are $50. :(
 
Quick/dumb question...

Manual for my 16 ST says Motorcraft CYFS-12y-2 SP-537 is the stock plug.

Has that particular Motorcraft part been replaced by CYFS-12y-PCT SP-550?

I checked the Mountune store and while their photo says SP-537, it looks like they updated the description to say SP-550 so I'm guessing all that's changed is the part number. Anyone know for sure?

glad someone asked this
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kyio
Replaced the old NGK 6509 with new NGK 6509 after ~ 30k miles, gap had widened marginally, new ones set at 0.028, engine is stock, I have been happy with these spark plugs. The set I just bought cost me fifteen more dollars than the old ones I removed, somewhat upsetting. Owning a vehicle is simply more expensive; fuel, oil, spark plugs, tires everything just costs more than it did even a year ago.
 
Awesome write up. Def saved me from posting. BUT just to be sure. If I don’t want to go a step colder and am not tuned I should be getting the NGK (6509) LTR6IX-11? Or is there a better option?
 
Awesome write up. Def saved me from posting. BUT just to be sure. If I don’t want to go a step colder and am not tuned I should be getting the NGK (6509) LTR6IX-11? Or is there a better option?
Rutheniums are better than iridiums so if you're not going step colder I think it would be NGK 90495 LTR6BHX. Some one will yell at me shortly if that's wrong.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: MtnMan
After 18,000 miles of mostly running Stratified E30 tune I thought I'd check on the 1-step colder Rutheniums, LTR7BHX Stock No. 95605

1 and 4 .027" , adjusted to .026"
2 and 3 still .026", no adjustment needed
👍😎

I don't understand why anyone bothers with Iridiums anymore 🤷
 
Howdy, I'm wondering if someone with good knowledge could help me out here, as I'm a little stuck on exactly what plugs to get (even after reading this post in it's entirety, yes, I know, lol)

So I have a !!!STOCK!!! (sorry, just wanted to emphasize) 2013 Focus ST, 94k miles on it, and have only done a few upgrades/mods to it since I bought it last November. To my best inspection, it's got a stock intercooler, stock turbo, and stock exhaust. It is not tuned and does not have a tuner. I recently was told by a friend, who literally knows everything about ST's, about running step-colder plugs for better performance. It's not that I don't trust this friend, but I'm wondering if he suggested them based on a TUNED set up/mindset. Also just to note here if it's necessary, I currently use 93 fuel, which was also suggested by this friend for better performance. So I got a set of Denso ITV22 plugs and put them in myself. As embarrassing as it is, I did not check the gapping like I know now lol, but have all the proper tools NOW to do the job correctly. dramatically inhales That being said, after changing the plugs (with the ITV22s) my car had a few issues that lead to the fuel low pressure sensor having to be replaced along with the map sensor as well. Before replacing the plugs I had to replace the canister purge valve, which actually already looked brand new. Anyways, so the plugs I pulled out were NGK LTR6IX-11 (if I remember correctly - wish I had paid more attention facepalm). Since I've got the car back from the shop from the most recent repair, I've had a sneaking suspicion that me not checking the gapping on the plugs lead to the issues with the sensors and their eventual demise. The car is running normal at the moment, however. I just wanted to give a complete picture of what I've done so that I can be given a more crystal clear answer on which plugs are the absolute correct ones so I can avoid any more shenanigans. It could be that the ITV22s are fine (when gapped correctly) or that I should be using stock-rated plugs since she's not officially tuned yet. To be clear, I only use this car for commute and have only pushed it a handful of times to have a little fun. Advice would be very very much appreciated, and I thank you in advance!

Best Wooshes,
-David
 
@dspann typically plugs aren't going to directly cause sensor failures, but you also haven't included context as to why those sensors were replaced. Codes? Drivability?

Anyway, regardless of tuned or not, your colder plugs will be okay, but also regardless of tune you should have gapped them, using the proper gap tool and feeler gauges. Don't ever use the coin tool.


These cars eat spark plugs so at the very least you are prolonging the miles you can run these plugs because the plugs deteriorate and gap opens as they wear.

Also regardless if you ever plan to tune, make sure you install an aftermarket intercooler, your engine will thank you. Well, unless you never floor it, which in that case why did you buy an ST? :cool:
 
@TurboGT Thanks for the feedback. That helped clarify things for me.

The sensors were replaced, presumably, due to a bad wire splice on the MAP sensor connector. This was found after an engine diag. Apparently the bad connection messed with the pressure reading also on the fuel sensor.

(Also, intercooler is in the works very soon)

As of now, she's running fine. If I understand you correctly, there is no reason to pull out, gap, and replace the plugs I put in (until the next set)? Or do you recommend I get a new set and do it right?

-David
 
@TurboGT Thanks for the feedback. That helped clarify things for me.

The sensors were replaced, presumably, due to a bad wire splice on the MAP sensor connector. This was found after an engine diag. Apparently the bad connection messed with the pressure reading also on the fuel sensor.

(Also, intercooler is in the works very soon)

As of now, she's running fine. If I understand you correctly, there is no reason to pull out, gap, and replace the plugs I put in (until the next set)? Or do you recommend I get a new set and do it right?

-David
I'd simply remove, gap, and reinstall your itv22s that are currently in the engine. Could save you headaches in the future (misfires under boost, etc) as these plugs wear.
 
281 - 300 of 321 Posts