Ford Focus ST Forum banner
301 - 320 of 321 Posts
Just a PSA but I’m pretty sure the 2.7 eco boost uses heat range 6 stock, same as the ST. Didn’t realize until I noticed the 95605’s are a 7. So make sure you search by NGK park number on rockauto and don’t just buy plugs from a 2.7 lol

Time to switch mine out for some proper 95605’s after running the wrong ones for 12k miles! Props to AdaptX for not blowing up my engine with the wrong plugs lol
 
I think that was referencing Amazon products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MtnMan
I am running NGK one step colder with 0.18 gap to make it stable at 32psi boost map.
 
So we've been running the 1 step colder Ruthenium plugs in the Escape as well, even with no tune on it. The plugs below were set to .028" on June 15, 2020, and they had 50,739 miles on them when Gracen and I pulled them from the SUV today. This was my "long term test case" for the Rutheniums, and I think they did pretty darn well.

Now there's definitely some erosion on the center electrode, but plugs 1-3 still showed a gap of .030", with plug 4 still at .028". Only expanding the gap by .002" in 50k+ miles is WAY better than the previous Denso plugs I tried in it.

Plugs 1 and 2: (top is 1)

BTW, plug 1 had some oil on the area above the threads from the valve cover gasket leaking, so it leaked down onto the plug as I pulled it out. I looked down into the spark plug well with my camera afterwards and it didn't appear to be a ton, so I figured we'd just run it.
Image


Plugs 3 and 4: (top is 3)

Image
 
@rob99rt Hmmmm ya got me thinking, it would be a great time to change out the plugs in the wife's Escape. I'm certainly due for another change as well. I hadn't thought about the Escape until you mentioned something. I have been thinking about a tune for that 1.5L but I've only seen one site that does so. I'm curious if @MonsterTuned would do something via a Cobb AP or should I just go with Escape 1.5L tune and tuner
 
@rob99rt Hmmmm ya got me thinking, it would be a great time to change out the plugs in the wife's Escape. I'm certainly due for another change as well. I hadn't thought about the Escape until you mentioned something. I have been thinking about a tune for that 1.5L but I've only seen one site that does so. I'm curious if @MonsterTuned would do something via a Cobb AP or should I just go with Escape 1.5L tune and tuner
Not sure about a tune on a 1.5, sorry... I bet the 2.0 would be a lot of fun with one, but not sure what you'd do about the intercooler to keep the air charge cool. It's basically the same size as the stock one on the focus, and it works just as poorly.

Does the 1.5 use the same plugs as the 2.0?
 
Not sure about a tune on a 1.5, sorry... I bet the 2.0 would be a lot of fun with one, but not sure what you'd do about the intercooler to keep the air charge cool. It's basically the same size as the stock one on the focus, and it works just as poorly.

Does the 1.5 use the same plugs as the 2.0?
No clue on the plugs, I've got to research it but I know it's time to do so. I can't speak enough of how good this '17 bought new 1.5L has been for the Mrs. Hated we got priced out of the 2.0 due to added options but in sport mode the 1.5L is quick ish lol... Just curious if I could tune it up via someone here vs the site I found although I'm sure it's not a bad tune to go with (ap and tune). The intercooler though...hmmm ya make a good point. It's probably all moot cause in a few more years the boy is getting it as his 1st ride and he won't need any enhancements for sure. Vegas insurance is already killing me so the thought of adding him is nerve wracking.o_O:ROFLMAO:
 
You could tune it now and easily switch it back to Stage 0 when the teenager drives it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sovereign007
So we've been running the 1 step colder Ruthenium plugs in the Escape as well, even with no tune on it. The plugs below were set to .028" on June 15, 2020, and they had 50,739 miles on them when Gracen and I pulled them from the SUV today. This was my "long term test case" for the Rutheniums, and I think they did pretty darn well.

Now there's definitely some erosion on the center electrode, but plugs 1-3 still showed a gap of .030", with plug 4 still at .028". Only expanding the gap by .002" in 50k+ miles is WAY better than the previous Denso plugs I tried in it.

Plugs 1 and 2: (top is 1)

BTW, plug 1 had some oil on the area above the threads from the valve cover gasket leaking, so it leaked down onto the plug as I pulled it out. I looked down into the spark plug well with my camera afterwards and it didn't appear to be a ton, so I figured we'd just run it.
View attachment 430698

Plugs 3 and 4: (top is 3)

View attachment 430699
Any feedback on whether your Escape ran better, worse, same with these plugs? I'm looking to remove my Unleashed tune prior to selling and wondering if there's any reason to swap out the NGK 6510 installed for the tune. 2014 SE 2.0 AWD. Thanks for your time.
 
Any feedback on whether your Escape ran better, worse, same with these plugs? I'm looking to remove my Unleashed tune prior to selling and wondering if there's any reason to swap out the NGK 6510 installed for the tune. 2014 SE 2.0 AWD. Thanks for your time.
I couldn't tell any difference in how it ran, honestly, but the Ruthenium plugs definitely lasted longer and kept a tighter gap than the previous couple sets of plugs.
 
So we've been running the 1 step colder Ruthenium plugs in the Escape as well, even with no tune on it. The plugs below were set to .028" on June 15, 2020, and they had 50,739 miles on them when Gracen and I pulled them from the SUV today. This was my "long term test case" for the Rutheniums, and I think they did pretty darn well.

Now there's definitely some erosion on the center electrode, but plugs 1-3 still showed a gap of .030", with plug 4 still at .028". Only expanding the gap by .002" in 50k+ miles is WAY better than the previous Denso plugs I tried in it.

Plugs 1 and 2: (top is 1)

BTW, plug 1 had some oil on the area above the threads from the valve cover gasket leaking, so it leaked down onto the plug as I pulled it out. I looked down into the spark plug well with my camera afterwards and it didn't appear to be a ton, so I figured we'd just run it.
View attachment 430698

Plugs 3 and 4: (top is 3)

View attachment 430699
Must be the camera but those gaps look huge!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sovereign007
I read through a few of the posts here and didnt see much on verifying your plugs authenticity before installing (link below)...but I did see some asking where to buy plugs that are reputable. I do buy mine mostly off amazon, but the NGK Official store seems to have no issues with legitimate plugs. Amazon has free shipping and its usually within a day or two max, whereas RockAuto charges shipping and tax and shipping is at minimum a few days. You can offset this a tad with the daily 5% discount on every purchase, but you have to go search for it and it barely offsets some of the tax for example.

I was looking around to test coils and plugs, and I bought myself a spark plug tester to verify the arc quality. So using both the tester and the multimeter to check resistance, you can verify whether your plugs are going to operate properly BEFORE finding out the hard way (misfires/CELs) and it only takes literally a few minutes.
Fake NGK Iridium Spark Plugs | How To Test!! - plug reistance
Spark plug: Copper vs Ruthenium 💥 #shorts - plug arc/consistency
Amazon.com: NGK 6510 LTR7IX-11 Iridium IX Spark Plug (4 Pack) : Automotive - plug source (NGK Official store)
 
Re-read the last few pages and no one had mentioned this.
The 95605 rutheniums are no longer listed for the 2015 2.7tt edge sport.
They have the 90495 listed there now.

The 95605 are still attainable by searching them directly on rockauto.
@Duece McCracken can you double check me on this?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Duece McCracken
301 - 320 of 321 Posts