Ford Focus ST Forum banner

Spark Plug Options

324K views 620 replies 128 participants last post by  FWD_Fracas  
#1 · (Edited)
So, with the big turbos coming out, spark plug upgrades will be following very closely. When increasing the power by that much it is important to move to a slightly colder plug in order to keep cylinder temps down and reduce chances for pre-ignition/detonation.

The factory spark plug for the focus ST is an NGK plug PN: LTR6DI-8. If you break down the part number this is what you get.

LT (Long thread reach plug Tapered seat type 25mm) R (Resistor) 6 (heat range) D (Metal Shell Plating Spec Change) I (Laser Iridium) - 8 (0.8mm or .032")

The heat range for NGK plugs goes from 2 to 11 with 2 being the hottest and 11 being the coldest. This means that there are a couple options to go with for a colder spark plug.

The first is the NGK LTR7IX-11. This plug comes with a gap of 1.1mm or .044" and will require you to regap them to a range of .030" - .032". The IX at the end of the part number stands for High Performance Iridium.

The second option is the Denso ITV22.

I stands for iridium, and the letter T is the Thread Diameter x Hex size (14x16.0). The letter V represents the thread reach of 25mm with tapered seat. The heat range is designated by the number 22. This is equivalent to the NGK 7 and therefore one step colder than stock. The number 20 corresponds to the stock heat range or NGK 6.

We are going to be running the NGK LTR7IX-11's in our car with the GTX2867. We are not sure what gap we are going to run yet but will be experimenting with that a bit to see what works best.
 
#224 · (Edited)
To make it easier to follow and critique I retitled the logs and put it all in one post. This comparison between factory LTR6 plugs the showed a measured gap of.028 and NGK LTR7 gapped to .028. The comparison was completed on the same tank of fuel, same ambient temp, same road, and same version of AP firmware over three different days.

Cobb stage 2 factory plug:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2oomynv2vso41c/Cobbstage2factoryplug1.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uwhsafp3ywqa6de/Cobbstage2factoryplug2.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/utrlq2dbn88cevi/Cobbstage2factoryplug3.csv

Cobb stage 2 LTR7IX-11

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xpdmzlj4f4c9xk3/Cobbstage2LTR7IX-11plug1.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0e0a14zvf06jnst/Cobbstage2LTR7IX-11plug2.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0e0a14zvf06jnst/Cobbstage2LTR7IX-11plug2.csv

FSW stage 2 LTR7IX-11

https://www.dropbox.com/s/bixtgtxfboo2whn/FSWstage2LTR7IX-11plug1.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u07fm71t6ito6bu/FSWstage2LTR7IX-11plug2.csv
 
#230 · (Edited)
There is no difference in the logs between the NGK and OEM plugs. Colder plugs prevent pre-ignition and not detonation. The knock sensor only picks up detonation. If the car is running smoothly with no issues the colder plugs are a good purchase and some insurance against pre-ignition.

Cylinder 4 is unhappy in a couple of these logs as it looks to be the noisiest cylinder. There is a relationship between charge temperatures and the correction values. What is probably happening is that as the charge temperatures get into the 70s consistently cyl 4 starts to knock first.

I suggest taking more heatsoaked logs by doing a multi gear pull 2-3-4 taking each gear to redline.
 
#231 · (Edited)
For comparison here are some logs with Cobb stage 2 and the ltr7 plugs ign corr 1-4. Less timing is being pulled but it also has less boost. logs 1 and 3 show timing advancing, log 2 has timing being pulled -1.38, log for shows -.5. I will take your advise and log some 2-3-4 pulls soon. Thanks again for reviewing those logs.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6sc068f3mbnxy5j/cobb2ltr7-1.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qoiz4m9m90qpo8a/cobb2ltr7-2.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rgcffauv2e4ijg6/cobb2ltr7-3.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kszldyfhyrgpmr/cobb2ltr7-4.csv
 
#232 ·
For comparison here are some logs with Cobb stage 2 and the ltr7 plugs. Less timing is being pulled but it also has less boost. logs 1 and 3 show timing advancing, log 2 has timing being pulled -1.38, log for shows -.5 I will take your advise and log some 2-3-4 pulls soon. Thanks again for reviewing those logs.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vhwaj1sm0x0jnoz/cobb2ltr7-1.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u7jeuy00ycv1ef0/cobb2ltr7-2.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kom36j3kojmphny/cobb2ltr7-3.csv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rewlc9atki2pr0b/cobb2ltr7-4.csv
Not a problem and yes the COBB map is a bit less aggressive. Putting the motor under higher temperature load usually reveals if a tune is too aggressive.
 
#233 ·
Haha at least you don't drive a Dodge Dart (besides the obvious reasons...)!!

"The Dart—at least 1.4-liter turbo models—uses NGK iridium spark plugs, which retail for $33 each on Mopar’s parts site, but a massive backorder on these plugs meant that we were charged 25 percent extra to get the plugs in posthaste. This pushed the per-plug price to a staggering $43.56. It gets worse—we couldn’t find the plugs from parts suppliers like NAPA or O’Reilly, and even though the plugs are produced by NGK for Mopar, they don’t appear on NGK’s databases. It seems that for now, Chrysler is the sole source for these plugs, and they’re not cheap. Backyard mechanics, take note."
-Car & Driver
 
#238 ·
Randy told me his tune was pulling more timing than needed, IIRC. Even the stock tune pulls timing.
 
#241 ·
And the 4th cylinder is like that on many ST's including mine. Do a log with Cobb stage 0, it's supposed to be the same as stock.
 
#245 · (Edited)
Post 224 ltr6 with Cobb stage 2 and FSW stage 2 same tunes ltr7 all on the same tank of gas, same ambient temp 3rd gear pulls.

Post 229 ltr7 only same FSW stage 2 tune. Same tank of gas as 224. 3rd gear pull, ign corr 1 thru 4.

Post 231 ltr7 only same Cobb stage 2 tune. Same tank of fuel as 224. 3rd gear pull ign corr 1 thru 4.

Post 242 was done on a different tank of fuel from the same station same tunes. Ltr7 plugs, 2nd thru 4th pull, ign corr 1 thru 4. Same Cobb stage 2 and FSW stage 2 tunes
 
#246 ·
I go to an auto parts store to buy a gapping tool and shims for my denso iridium plugs (cold step 1), and the guy basically said iridium plugs should never be re-gapped, it's too brittle, don't put shims in it'll damage the electrode, etc. and scares me out of buying the tools for the time being.
Is he full of it? Do I not need to check each plug for the same gap distance? Should I just throw them in the car as is?
 
#259 ·
I was just sent a pm by someone asking if they should change plugs as they are now at stage 2. I'm definitely not a protuner by any means and I'm still learning but I'd thought I'd post my response to further discussion on the topic.

I'm still testing but it would seem that one step cooler has no real over all effect on a stage 2. Working with Alex the numbers look good and he supports the idea of running the coldest plug you can get away with to reduce the chance of pre ignition and that doesn't effect drive ability. Skizzo is working on long term drivability data but I think it's looking like no problems. It seems the hotter plugs. may be for emissions purposes. I'm curious what the number will look like in our Phoenix summers. Day time temps around 115 +/- and night temps around 95 +/-. My recommendation is fill up with a tank of gas your going to use, take some data logs to post, and let those in the know critique your numbers.
 
#260 ·
#270 ·
Out of four denso's itv22 that I got from Edge, one had center electrode bent like yours out of the box....Gapped them at 0.28" and had random misfire around 5200 rpm twice in an hour driving enthusiastically..Took them out and carefully re-gaped them at 0.26".. Big difference, before I would get dead range in my gas pedal while slowly rolling into boost almost like fuel mapping issue....not anymore, strong, even and linear spool all the way up to 6000rpm. Running mr. T's 93 V5 aggro, forge IC,K&N filter.....After installing Denso's didn't do reflash, didn't reset KAM or change anything other than spark plugs...my old plugs( orig. fomoco ) looked good after 32k, nicely tan brownish colored...