Looks pretty good to me but that's not saying much. Post in the datalog thread and check out some of the other logs there. This was 3rd gear log right?

 

Yeah 3rd. Looks bad to me.

 

Looks fine to me, it's a normal Randy map.

 

What about the charge temps?

 

They are what they are. Gotta do a leak check!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Here's a couple more logs with the Cobb stage 3 OTS, not as much cylinder correction

3rd gear
datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log w/Cobb stg3 OTS

4th gear
datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log w/Cobb stg3 OTS

 

Here's a couple more logs with the Cobb stage 3 OTS, not as much cylinder correction

3rd gear
datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log w/Cobb stg3 OTS

4th gear
datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log w/Cobb stg3 OTS

And from what I see on my phone you're running more final spark advance here than the FSW map with negative corrections, which is a good thing! I'll overlay them this evening for a better view.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Performance wise, it seems to me that the COBB map is a little conservative (from what I understand as of now). It's sure safe, but very conservative as it's slowly adding timing. In a quarter mile run, I'd rather see -1 on each cylinder than +1> +1.5> +2> +2.5 >+3.5. You are not making full power untill the end of the run.


Randy always told me that he was pulling more timing than needed for added safety.

And Silver_Shooter, why do you say he is having a boost leak? I don't understand how a boost leak would mean higher CAT temp.

 

No one said boost leak but I'm having higher charge temps than a lot of people with this intercooler setup. Although 20* isn't bad I'm trying to figure out how people are getting only 6* rise in third or fourth.

 

Why is the WGDC in the OTS COBB stuck at 100% in higher rpm? 100% means completly closed right? So full boost? These ECU are a nightmare, I'm used to GM's.

 

OTS hits 100% WGDC around 5600 rpm. Mine is tuned to hit 100% at 4600.
It's not that the wg is closed, it's that the EBC is venting all pressure away from the WG in an attempt to raise boost. However, the small turbo/light WG can't provide it. At a certain rpm, it doesn't matter if you're at 70% or 100% DC, boost is the same.

You can tune boost for low end and mid-range, but you have to focus in spark tuning up top to make power.

As for your other question, Alex and I have discussed this a little. It's been shown to be that way on several cars. With so many factors, multipliers, and compensations being applied, it's hard to find the answer.

Many ways to skin a donkey.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I don't........

 

What "drive ability" complaints do you have with the OTS maps? Other then the BOV pulse and the lack of Randy's retardedly fast spool/throttle ramp. I actually prefer the OTS over Randy's tune.. ( bov pulse is easy to fix with ATR )

Just curious why you say the drive ability sucks..


2013 TS3 ATRtuned

 

Well for starters the bov pulse isn't there in the 202 OTS. But mainly lack of throttle response with the Cobb tune. You have to go over 30% throttle to get any good acceleration.

 

Gotcha, see I'm the opposite I didn't like the instant un linear feel of Randy's tune

And after seeing the weird stuff it did on the dyno I liked it even less


2013 TS3 ATRtuned

 

I agree with both of you. My settings are right in between. Not as lethargic as OTS and not as aggressive as Randy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

What tables are you using to gain throttle response? I think I'd like the middle ground like you say


2013 TS3 ATRtuned

 

What do you guys think about me running a couple gallons of e85 in a full tank of 93. Can I do it on either tune?

 

More then a gallon or 2 I would definitely adjust the tune for it

Probably be safe to run a gallon mixed in on a OTS tune or Randy's


2013 TS3 ATRtuned

 

Another question. Is the ATR safe? Can you go wrong to the point that you damage the car without knowing it?

 

Yes
You have unrestricted control of the ECM basically

2013 TS3 ATRtuned

 

Seriously, you need to read and understand it's operation, but if you know what you're changing and why, make small adjustments, and review logs, it's not that bad. And it's catching on enough that there are more people to pitch in and offer guidance.
I suggest reading the ATR tuning guide several hundred times. It takes a bit for it to click, but once you understand, things get pretty easy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yesterday, I followed the links you PM'ed me and started reading. Do I need to read the V1.02 and V2.02 books?

 

So if I understand correctly, v1.02 is for pro-tuner while v2.02 is for people like you and me. And Him...

 

No 2.02 is the latest release of the OTS

 

Sorry guys, at the track. Will get back to you later.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Silver do you think your reading temps so low due to the location of your sensor? Yours in on the end tank cold side right? I'm guessing all cores with sensors in the end tank read lower temps. Can anyone else confirm location of the sensor and the charge temps related to it?

 

I figured id post some logs up as i go. Maybe i can get some help along the way :saint:

Both logs are in 3rd gear, and im seeing issues with both.
datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log3

datazap.me | builtboosted | jb log3

Accidental post sorry......

 

we logged on an 88 degree day too