Joined
·
1,900 Posts
My 2013 is creeping up towards 50K miles, and the stock brake pads will be too thin for comfort later this Fall, and the rotors are clearly getting worn, so I'm thinking about brake replacements.
The car is a daily, no track use, so I don't need big brakes.
Honestly, the only "upgrade" I'm planning on is using the Carbotech 1521 Bobcat pads for better modulation versus stock/Hawk/Ferodo/etc. For me, the stock rotors have been fine and they are dirt cheap too.
Typically I like to replace the retaining springs when I do pad/rotor replacements, and those are about $12 each. But then I noticed that replacement brand new factory calipers are under $200 for all four corners, so why shouldn't I? I wouldn't have to worry about finding torn dust boots, cranking the rear pistons back in (and tearing a dust boot in the process), nor screwing up the ABS by over-compressing the front calipers. Just replace 'em, bleed 'em and top off with fresh brake fluid and be done.
Any arguments for/against doing this?
TIA,
Mark
The car is a daily, no track use, so I don't need big brakes.
Honestly, the only "upgrade" I'm planning on is using the Carbotech 1521 Bobcat pads for better modulation versus stock/Hawk/Ferodo/etc. For me, the stock rotors have been fine and they are dirt cheap too.
Typically I like to replace the retaining springs when I do pad/rotor replacements, and those are about $12 each. But then I noticed that replacement brand new factory calipers are under $200 for all four corners, so why shouldn't I? I wouldn't have to worry about finding torn dust boots, cranking the rear pistons back in (and tearing a dust boot in the process), nor screwing up the ABS by over-compressing the front calipers. Just replace 'em, bleed 'em and top off with fresh brake fluid and be done.
Any arguments for/against doing this?
TIA,
Mark